Nuremberg Trials Essays - War Crimes, International Criminal Law

Nuremberg Trials Essays - War Crimes, International Criminal Law Nuremberg Trials After World War II, numerous war-crimes trials tried and convicted many Axis leaders. Judges from Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States tried twenty-two Nazi leaders for: crimes against humanity (mostly about the Holocaust), violating long-established rules of war, and waging aggressive war. This was known as the Nuremberg Trials. Late in 1946, the German defendants were indicted and charged before a war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg(Shairo, 4). Twenty of the defendants were physicians who stood at or near the top of the medical authority of the Third Reich, as governmental, military, or SS officials. The others had executive positions, which brought them close to connections with medical affairs. It all started when people heard about the Nazis in human acts, just about four months after World War II started. No one would believe that such a thing would happen. While the people were thinking like that the Jews were being shipped out of the country, some Jews were being put in working camps or farms. This was the beginning of the Final Solution of the Holocaust. On August 8 the London Agreement was signed. They later named it the International Military Tribunal (IMT), having 8 judges. This was made so that they would try to stop the Nazi crimes. They had additional Nuremberg hearings that were broken down into twelve trials. In connection with these trials, the U.S. military tribunals had thirty-five defendants and released nineteen of them because they could find anything to get them on. They made Nuremberg Laws because of Hitlers concentration camps and his other inhuman acts(Gutman, 142_). He didnt go by the lead system, he made himself the Supreme Judge. Hitler could imprison or execute anyone he wanted to. He made laws keeping Jews out of certain public places or jobs. He wouldnt let Jews have German citizenship. The Nuremberg Laws stated that there would be no more inhumane acts or segregation of Jews. One of the positive sides of the Nuremberg incident was the trials documented Nazi crimes for future generations. Many citizens of the world remember hearing about the Nazis brutalities and inhuman acts. Hundreds of official Nazi documents entered into evidence at Nuremberg telling the horrible tale of the Third Reich in the Nazis own words. Six million Jews, and others not liked by the Nazis were killed. Not one convicted Nazi denied that the mass killing had occurred. Each denied only personal knowledge and responsibility. The negative things that happened at Nuremberg were the establishment of the International Military Tribunal to lead to a permanent counterpart before which crimes against humanity can be tried. Within Twenty-four wars between nations and ninety-three civil wars between 1945 and 1992, no international body had been gathered to try aggressor nations or individuals accused of war crimes(Conot). Despite the reluctance of nations to unite in common cause and move swiftly toward a lasting road to aggression, hope yes abides for the best of Nurembergs brightest promise. The world had a problem of what to do about the Nazi regime that had presided over the extermination of some six million Jews and deaths of millions of others with no basis in military necessity. Never before in history had the victors tried the vanquished for crimes committed during a war. Though, never in history had they commit crimes of such inhumanity. The International Military Tribunal held to the principle that persons committing a criminal violation of international law are responsible for violation, on the grounds that crimes of this nature are the result of their own acts. The tribunal thought for crimes carried out on orders from above, since many of the crimes had been committed in one with the Reich policy. The International Military Tribunal found it appropriate to single out the persecution of the Jews. The testimony given at the Nuremberg Trial, the document presented by the prosecution, and the entire record of its proceedings establish an exceptional source for the study of the Holocaust. The Nuremberg debates may continue for decades due to the tribunals rulings at Nuremberg(West, 93). The Nuremberg Trials have been put down as acts of vengence(Conot). Some observers considered a number of sentence as being too harsh. Others have pointed

Practice Identifying Subject and Object Complements

Practice Identifying Subject and Object Complements In our article on complements, we discussed subject complements, which follow a linking verb and provide additional information about the subject of the sentence. The subject complement is normally a noun or an adjective that defines or renames the subject in some way. We also learned about object complements, which follow and modify a direct object and provide additional information about it. An object complement can be a noun or adjective or any word acting as a noun or adjective. To easily understand it, think of it this way: Subject complements and object complements fill out and complete our sentences. Object complements provide more detail about the object of a sentence, while subject complements provide information about the subject to a sentence. In this exercise, you will learn to identify subject complements and object complements in sentences. Instructions for Practice Exercise Identify the complement in each of the following sentences, and note whether it is a subject complement or an object complement. When you are done, compare your answers, which appear below the test. Pablo is extremely intelligent.I find him intelligent.Shyla eventually became my best friend.Our neighbors dogs are very dangerous.Gingers hair dye turned the water pink.After our disagreement on the first day of school, Jenny became my friend for life.We painted the ceiling blue.You are making me sad.Paula is a good dancer.Dorothy named her parakeet Onan.Known as the father of the Texas blues, Blind Lemon Jefferson was a popular entertainer in the 1920s.The gift Karen gave her brother was a hamster.Buck grew up in Oklahoma and became an expert horse rider before reaching his 18th birthday.  I once considered Nancy my fiercest enemy.After reviewing the details  of the case, the  court pronounced the boy not guilty.By the second month of the drought, the river had run dry. Answers Pablo is extremely  intelligent. (subject complement)I find him  intelligent. (object complement)Shyla eventually became my best  friend.  (subject complement)Our neighbors dogs are very dangerous. (subject complement)Gingers hair dye turned the water  pink. (object complement)After our disagreement on the first day of school, Jenny became my  friend  for life. (subject complement)We painted the ceiling  blue. (object complement)You are making me  sad. (object complement)Paula is a good  dancer. (subject complement)Dorothy named her parakeet  Onan. (object complement)Known as the father of the Texas blues, Blind Lemon Jefferson was a popular  entertainer  in the 1920s. (subject complement)The gift Karen gave her brother was a  hamster. (subject complement)Buck grew up in Oklahoma and became an expert  horse rider  before reaching his 18th birthday.  (subject complement)I once considered Nancy my fiercest  enemy.  (object complement)After reviewin g the details of the case, the  court pronounced the boy  not guilty.  (object complement) By the second month of the drought, the river had run  dry. (subject complement)​